<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>composed &#8211; Fountain Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fountainmagazine.com/tag/composed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fountainmagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>From Cell to Body</title>
		<link>https://fountainmagazine.com/all-issues/2002/issue-39-july-september-2002/from-cell-to-body/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louima Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 39 (July - September 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromosome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://107.21.79.195/all-issues/2002/issue-39-july-september-2002/from-cell-to-body/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Living creatures, which are arranged in an organization by a hierarchic system of non-living matter, are combinations of syst eachms within other. Each level contains unique systemic arrangements. However, in different levels, each organization works in a wonderful and perfect harmony with other levels so that the living creature survive. As a result, the responsibilities [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Living creatures, which are arranged in an organization by a hierarchic system of non-living matter, are combinations of syst eachms within other. Each level contains unique systemic arrangements. However, in different levels, each organization works in a wonderful and perfect harmony with other levels so that the living creature survive. As a result, the responsibilities entrusted its structure and function(s) are not interrupted.</em></p>
<h3><b>Who created such miraculous entities?</b></h3>
<p>At present, many highly educated people and scientists maintain there should be a creator who knows and has the power to design of all these perfectly working organizations. Starting from an atom&#8217;s particles, this systemic structure consisting of atoms, molecules, macromolecules, cell organelles, cells, tissues, organs, systems, and finally a living creature exists in all ecological balances on Earth. Without seeing the impact of such a wide and large power, it is not logical to expect that all that we see in creation is the result of unconscious nature and thus conclude that everything occurred by blind happenstance.</p>
<p>We remain alive because millions of cells work together. Each maintains its life by being perfectly divided into units and having complex mechanisms within its structure. Each unit has unique features. When these units come together, large and unpredictable new features might occur. For example, hydrogen is flammable and oxygen is burning, but when they join together to form water, there is no fire.</p>
<p>A cell, which consists of electrons, protons, and neutrons, might function differently according to its location in the body. When cells are combined with each other, they form cell groups that acquire such characteristics as flexibility, movement, reproduction, and nerve transmission. We know that all such body units as cells, tissues, and organs have a perfect integrated system. And yet it is still unclear how they combine and carry out the functions necessary to make eyes, the brain, bones, muscles, and so on, all of which are composed mainly of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphate.</p>
<p>In short, many scientists are very curious about how brain tissues can perform hundreds of different functions (e.g., hearing, thinking, and feeling) even though they are composed of atoms.</p>
<h3><b>Recent discoveries</b></h3>
<p>For the last two decades, scientists have been working on small molecules, DNA, RNA, and proteins, in order to shed some light to the unknown aspects of life. The Human Genome Project (HUGO) is one of the largest projects and is scheduled to be finished by 2005. Its goal is to sequence the cell&#8217;s genetic material, which presumably numbers some 100,000 genes, and explain each one&#8217;s function(s). However, so far only 10,000 to 20,000 are known. And this despite the fact that scientists have spent centuries learning how molecules are formed and what kind of force drives the atoms to form molecules!</p>
<p>Several famous foundations, among them Yale University, New York&#8217;s Cold Harbor Laboratory, and Germany&#8217;s Max Planc Institute, have been researching questions related to the body&#8217;s structure. For example, how did it occur in such a small living cell, even though its building mechanism and systems are far more complicated than the system, which is all around us? How are dead cells expelled and replaced by new ones without disrupting any system&#8217;s continued functioning.</p>
<p>In short, living creatures still hold many secret&#8211;so many, in fact, that despite recent technological advancements many unknown subjects remain. What we know may be compared to a drop of water and the ocean.</p>
<h3><b>DNA and genes</b></h3>
<p>Excluding blood cells, one body contains millions of cells. For instance, there are approximately 5 million white blood cells within 1 mm3 of blood. Each cell has a nucleus (its brain), and each nucleus contains genetic codes (DNA). Such genetic information as hair and eye color, bodily height, and blood group is hidden within the folded DNA and packed onto 46 human chromosomes distributed. If we could unfold the DNA package within each cell, we would get a 2-meter long DNA strain.</p>
<p>In addition, each chromosome contains small DNA units (genes). Scientists estimate that there are about 100,000 genes, each of which has a unique function, in a human genome. For instance, there are globin (the major component of hemoglobin) genes on chromosomes 11 and 16, and individual genes on the X chromosome that enable us to see colors. Another gene on the X chromosome synthesizes a dystrophine protein within our muscles, other genes on chromosome 6 control ferine metabolism, another gene on chromosome 7 controls the ion traffic, and so on.</p>
<p>When we look at a gene&#8217;s structure, we realize that it they only are encoded by four letters (nucleotides): adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and timin (T). The different orders of these four nucleic acids enable the gene to encode billions of protein amino acid combinations. The smallest gene, globin, is composed of 60,000 letters; the longest gene, distrophine, is composed of 2.4 million letters. If any letter is missing or is in the wrong place within the globin gene (e.g., AATG_ letter missing or AATTC letter change instead of AATGC), the ensuing point mutation, deletion, or insertion within the original order causes serious and incurable genetic diseases.</p>
<p>Many mutations occur within the functional parts of the 100,000 genes; however, they are instantly (10-10 second) repaired by the DNA &#8216;s repair mechanism. If not, serious diseases might occur. Interestingly, not all mutations cause genetic diseases, for while one mutation could be common within one human population, it might not occur so frequently within another one. Amazingly, our genes, composed of billions of letters (but only from A, T, C, and G) and always work in a harmony and collaboration so that our body can survive in a perfect manner. Therefore, spontaneous mutations or breakdowns are instantly repaired and old cells are replaced by new ones so quickly that we are not even aware of it.</p>
<h3><b>Conclusion</b></h3>
<p>In sum, the Creator has given each living entity a perfect and aesthetic body that functions in a most amazing manner. The only thing we have to do is thank the Creator for His generosity. That is perhaps the easiest task for us to do.</p>
<ul>
<li><em><b>References</b></em></li>
<li>Thomas Gelehrter-William Wilkins, Principle of Medical Genetics Scientific American (January 1998).</li>
<li>http://www.genome.gov/</li>
<li>http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sociobiology</title>
		<link>https://fountainmagazine.com/all-issues/1996/issue-13-january-march-1996/sociobiology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louima Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 13 (January - March 1996)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sociobiology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://107.21.79.195/all-issues/1996/issue-13-january-march-1996/sociobiology/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In all biological systems, the organism of the future is encoded in the macro molecular structure of DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid). It is this molecular architecture, present in every cell, that determines all the characteristics of an organism. Genetics is commonly taken to refer to a part of biology that concerns itself with the study of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all biological systems, the organism of the future is encoded in the macro molecular structure of DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid). It is this molecular architecture, present in every cell, that determines all the characteristics of an organism.</p>
<p>Genetics is commonly taken to refer to a part of biology that concerns itself with the study of the transmission of hereditary characters. This fascinating science would have remained quite benign if this was all that it was. However, recombinant DNA technology with all the power it offers for biological control has changed all that. By making it possible to manipulate the reproductive potential of an organism, modern genetics has the power to alter the course of development of living organisms. Life can be changed, for good or ill; it can be enhanced or retarded or mutilated. Moreover, whatever molecular genetics can do to the biological world can in principle, be done to human beings. Molecular genetics poses a grave threat to our notions of human life, its intent and its meanings.</p>
<p>In his book <em>Responsible Science</em> (1986), Robert Nelson wrote: </p>
<p>The challenge of molecular biology to traditional humanistic and religious concepts of human life needs to be taken very seriously. Not only the nature of life, but its purpose and worth are called into question by the rapidly growing knowledge of DNA and cellular development. If the human organism can ostensibly be reduced to an assortment of proteins and amino acids, hardly distinguishable at molecular levels from those of other organisms, where is the distinctiveness of human life to he found? And if found, how explained?</p>
<p>Biology, especially in the form of using genetics and evolution to explain social phenomena, has become a reductionist exercise. Reductionism means trying to explain the properties of complex wholes-molecules, say or societies-in terms of the units of which those wholes are composed. Scientists who are reductionists would argue, for example that the properties of a protein molecule could be uniquely determined and predicted in terms of the properties of the electrons, protons, etc., of which it atoms are composed. In a similar way, they could (and some do) argue that the properties of a human society are no more than the sum of the behaviours and tendencies of the individual humans of which that society is composed.</p>
<p>Genetics and evolution, as indicated above, have been used to explain social phenomena. This is the area of science called sociobiology. It is a discipline that passes moral judgement on many social issues because it presents biology as the human fate, an inescapable reality of nature. Since it is natural, the implication is that it is immutable.</p>
<p>Sociobiologists equate the social with the biological and maintain that differences of class, race, colour, gender and even economic status originate in individual biology. This type of thinking could lead to dangerous conclusions of a sort most of us would regard as immoral and unethical. It can lead, for instance, to the belief that some races are born ‘inferior’ to others; that women are inferior’ to men; IQ (Intelligence Quotient) is genetically determined; that social inequalities (wealth and poverty) are biological in origin. The big problem with this is that political leaders could use such arguments to assert that the current social order must prevail because it is the law of nature.</p>
<p>Sociobiology reached its peak when some biologists claimed to have discovered absolute evidence for genetic determinants of human behaviour. In his popular book <em>The Selfish Gene</em> (1976), Richard Dawkins wrote:</p>
<p>We, and all other animals, are machines created by our genes. Like successful Chicago gangsters, our genes have survived, in some cases for millions of years, in a highly competitive world. This entitles us to expect certain qualities in our genes. I shall argue that a predominant quality to be expected in a successful gene is ruthless selfishness&#8230; Much as we might wish to believe otherwise, universal love and the welfare of the species as a whole are concepts which simply do not make evolutionary sense &#8230; If you wish &#8230; to build a society in which individuals cooperate generously towards a common good; you can expect little help from biological nature.</p>
<p>The selfish gene thus operates to enhance its own selfish interests. The theory is based on the belief that genetic differences lead to behavioural differences, and that organisms are hosts to genes rather than the other way round. This provides the basis, as sociobiologists themselves claim, for the systematic study of the biological basis of all forms of social behavior, including sexual and parental behaviour, in all, kinds of organisms, including humans.</p>
<p>More and more human attributes are being subjected to a biological explanation. The Islamic view of human nature, however, does not consider biology as an inevitability. Human morality is the most important determinant, encompassing the spiritual dimension beautifully: <em>The most honoured among you in the sight of God is the most righteous among you. And God has full knowledge and is well acquainted [with all things]. </em> (Hujurat, 49.13)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
