<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>southern &#8211; Fountain Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fountainmagazine.com/tag/southern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fountainmagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Southern Pine Beetle: A Pest Using Pesticides</title>
		<link>https://fountainmagazine.com/all-issues/2012/issue-89-september-october-2012/southern-pine-beetle-a-pest-using-pesticides/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louima Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 89 (September - October 2012)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beetles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[figure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galleries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larvae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pine Beetle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://107.21.79.195/all-issues/2012/issue-89-september-october-2012/southern-pine-beetle-a-pest-using-pesticides/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The use of pesticides by farmers for fighting against pests harming their crops is a common yet controversial issue in bioethics and agricultural sciences. These pesticides often kill their target [1] pests efficiently, but can also cause direct or indirect deaths of several other species. It is well known that the disappearance of any member [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of pesticides by farmers for fighting against pests harming their crops is a common yet controversial issue in bioethics and agricultural sciences. These pesticides often kill their target [1] pests efficiently, but can also cause direct or indirect deaths of several other species. It is well known that the disappearance of any member in a food chain can easily wipe out the entire ecosystem or part of it because of the poorly understood complex interactions amongst various species. In this article, we will share our knowledge about the amazing life cycle of a beetle that uses a natural pesticide in order to protect its own food sources [1, 2].</p>
<p><span id="more-1411"></span></p>
<p>Southern Pine Beetles (Dendroctonus frontalis, figure 1) are one of the most harmful pests in the world, causing hundreds of million dollars worth of damage to pine trees in the Southern United States. These beetles initiate their attack on a pine tree by having a small group of female beetles dig into the inner park (Figure 2) and phloem of the pine tree. Once this work is done these females will secrete a chemical that will draw other male and female beetles to the affected pine tree. This initial attack is followed by a massive attack by a larger number of beetles, enabling them to easily overcome the defenses of the pine trees due to the sheer number of beetles. Shortly after taking over the tree, mating begins between the male and female beetles. As part of the mating process the females fill the excavated galleries within the trees with eggs. After the eggs have been laid the adult beetles will then leave the tree and continue to attack other trees. Attacking trees and causing their death is of course a sad story and may not sound very interesting since most pests have similar attack strategies; however, one detail that we did not mention yet makes this process more intriguing. What do the larvae eat to complete their development within a gallery that is inside a dead tree? The answer is: Fungi.</p>
<p>Pine beetles establish a symbiotic life structure with a beneficial fungus (Entomocorticium sp. A), which is the main food source for their larvae. Adult pine beetles have a body compartment (mycangium), in which they can carry this fungus. When adult beetles dig galleries in tree barks, they inoculate these galleries with the fungi. This fungus will grow in these galleries that helps the beetles&#8217; larvae complete their development by providing them with a source of nutrition. Fungi also benefit from this process by being transferred from one tree to another with the help of the beetles. This symbiotic life structure is threatened by the existence of an antagonistic fungus, (Ophiostoma minus, also known as blue stain fungus) and parasitic mites both of which the southern pine beetles also bring along. The blue stain fungus has no nutritional importance for larvae, this fungus can grow in the same galleries as the beneficial fungus and they can even outcompete them. In addition, the parasitic mites feed on the blue fungi and can prove harmful beetles as the amount of blue fungi increases. Therefore, beetles&#8217; larvae cannot survive for long and thus the reproduction of the southern pine beetles can be disrupted without some form of defense.</p>
<p>A recent study by Scott et al. has shed some light on this complicated life structure [3]. These tiny beetles, which are only a few millimeters long, have a smart defense mechanism to prevent their larvae (Figure 3, pink arrow). As far as the history tells us, humankind started using pesticides about 5000 years ago, but these tiny beetles have been using them for preventing the growth of the blue-stain fungi long before humans started using pesticides. These studies showed that the symbiotic coexistence of southern pine beetles and the beneficial fungi (Figure 3, yellow circle) is maintained by a (actinomycetous) bacterium (Figure 3, inside the red square). This bacterium produces a previously unknown antibiotic compound (named mycangimycin), which selectively inhibits the growth of blue-stain fungus hence providing a significant advantage for the maintenance of the beneficial fungi (that is, the main food source of the larvae). How can this bacterium even be present in the freshly carved galleries in pine trees in the first place? The surprising answer to this question is that they are transferred to these galleries by the very same pine beetles. As mentioned earlier, adult pine beetles carry beneficial fungi in their body compartment (mycangium) and inoculate the galleries they carved with this fungus to provide food for their larvae. In addition to this beneficial fungi these beetles carry they also carry bacteria that can produce antibiotic compound to inhibit the growth of blue-stain fungi and consequently diminish the number of parasitic mites. This bacterium can grow inside these galleries and even in a body compartment of adult southern pine beetles. Interestingly, this antibiotic kills blue-stain fungi but does not significantly affect the growth of the fungi, which is the food source for larvae. Thus, the beneficial fungi can multiply in number and offer enough food for the development of beetle larvae. Some of these larvae manage to grow to adults and then leave to attack other pine trees carrying the same fungi and bacteria with them (Figure 4).</p>
<p>The interactions within the rest of the life kingdoms is not any less complicated than the symbiosis between pine beetles, fungi, and the bacteria. The interactions between animals, plants and microbes are very complex and also fragile. Removing or replacing any member of an ecosystem can often result in a serious failure in the ecosystem as was observed many times especially within the last century.</p>
<h3><b>References</b></h3>
<ol>
<li>http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?org=NSF&amp;cntn_id=112319&amp;preview=false.</li>
<li>http://entnem.ufl.edu/creatures/trees/southern_pine_beetle.htm.</li>
<li>Scott, J.J., et al., &#8220;Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism.&#8221; Science, 2008. 322 (5898): p. 63.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tiniest Captains of the Ocean</title>
		<link>https://fountainmagazine.com/all-issues/2010/issue-74-march-april-2010/the-tiniest-captains-of-the-ocean/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louima Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 74 (March - April 2010)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blakemore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[figure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geomagnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hemisphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetesomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetotactic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetotactic bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seeking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://107.21.79.195/all-issues/2010/issue-74-march-april-2010/the-tiniest-captains-of-the-ocean/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The date of invention for compass still is not known with certainty. Some historians think that it was invented in China around 900 BC, while others claim that it was around 100 AD. The use of a magnetized needle as a navigation tool, however, was not until twelfth century. This brief information can be found [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The date of invention for compass still is not known with certainty. Some historians think that it was invented in China around 900 BC, while others claim that it was around 100 AD. The use of a magnetized needle as a navigation tool, however, was not until twelfth century. This brief information can be found from history books, after a quick search on the history of compass. However, it cannot be considered complete, since it does not mention the nation that has been using nanometer size magnets to find their directions for millions of years. They are the navigators of deep oceans and small ponds utilized with a technology that took thousands of years of humankind to discover. They are magnetotactic bacteria.</p>
<p><span id="more-1124"></span></p>
<p>In the early 1970s, a young graduate student, Richard Blakemore, observed an interesting group of bacteria in a mud sample collected from Eel Pond in Massachusetts. These bacteria were migrating through a certain edge of the microscope slide. Rotating the slide did not affect their motion; they were still moving through north. Repeating the experiment in the dark also showed that it was not light that affected the bacteria’s swimming direction. The experiments left one possible explanation to the directed motion of the bacteria and that was a crazy one-that they were sensing the magnetic field of the earth! It wasn’t hard for Blakemore to place a magnet next to the microscope slide and to prove that the crazy idea was indeed true. The bacteria were attracted by the south pole of the magnet and repelled by the north pole of it. This was the beginning of a new field of an interdisciplinary research, which attracted many scientists from very different fields such as, microbiology, physics, geophysics and paleogeology.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class=" size-full wp-image-6403" src="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_1-840.jpg" width="200" height="302" srcset="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_1-840.jpg 200w, https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_1-840-199x300.jpg 199w" sizes="(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /></p>
<p>To understand how magnetotactic bacteria feel the magnetic field, it would be useful to check one’s transmission electron micrograph (Figure 1). The chain of magnetite (iron oxide) crystals forming a specialized organelle, called magnetesome, can be seen easily. The length of the whole chain is around one micron and each small crystal is around 50-60 nanometers. Each small crystal can be considered as a small magnet. These small magnets are aligned in a way that they support each other and the chain becomes a strong magnet. A lipid bilayer membrane surrounds this chain and holds them together. Forming chains on a straight line is not an expected behavior for small magnetite crystals. If they are produced synthetically, they accumulate together to form an aggregate. The pathways of chain formation in magnetesome are still an open question.</p>
<p>Magnetotactic properties are not limited to a certain species. There are many different bacteria that have magnetotactic properties. Therefore the magnetesomes may differ in size, length and even in chemistry. Some magnetotactic bacteria have greigite (iron sulfide) minerals instead of magnetite. Alsothere are magnetotactic bacteria that have more than one magnetesomes. (Figure –2)</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class=" size-full wp-image-6404" src="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_2-c3a.jpg" width="450" height="306" srcset="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_2-c3a.jpg 450w, https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_2-c3a-300x204.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px" /></p>
<p>Magnetesomes passively align bacteria parallel to the geomagnetic field but do not exert a force on bacteria to change their speed. Aligned with the magnetic field, the bacteria decide to either move towards south or north. Interestingly, almost all magnetotactic bacteria in northern hemisphere are north seeking, almost all magnetotactic bacteria in southern hemisphere are south seeking, and magnetotactic bacteria living around the geomagnetic equator consist of almost equal number of bacteria of each magnetic polarity. The bacteria in northern and southern hemispheres may have different polarities but they have one thing in common; they both move downwards. The geomagnetic field is not exactly parallel to the earth’s surface except around the geomagnetic equator. As it may seem in figure-3, the magnetic field lines are tilted up and down respectively in southern and northern hemispheres. Therefore the north seeking bacteria in northern hemisphere end up at the bottom of the water and so do the south seeking bacteria in southern hemisphere. Most of the magnetotactic bacteria cannot survive in atmospheric oxygen levels, so sensing vertical position and moving downwards, where oxygen concentration is low, is crucial for them.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class=" size-full wp-image-6405" src="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_3-fec.jpg" width="250" height="320" srcset="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_3-fec.jpg 250w, https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_3-fec-234x300.jpg 234w" sizes="(max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" /></p>
<p>Being north seeking or down seeking, i.e. polarity, is a genetic property for magnetotactic bacteria. Almost all progenies (descendants) of a north-seeking cell are also north-seeking cells. However this requires partition of magnetesomes to each daughter cell during the division. Occasionally, daughter cells may have no magnetesomes or they maybe too small to have a magnetic moment, so they develop their own magnetesomes. When these progenies develop their own magnetesomes they may have either polarity. Therefore any natural population of magnetotactic bacteria has less than 0.5% “wrong” polarity members. Wrong is written in quotation marks because without that “mistake” magnetotactic bacteria would live only in one hemisphere of the earth.</p>
<p>Magnetotactic bacteria are not the only creatures that can sense geomagnetic field. For example birds, also, can sense geomagnetic field and find their direction while they are migrating. However, birds use other factors such as sun and the horizon to find their direction and their body is much more complex. Also they do not sense magnetic field in a mechanical way like magnetotactic bacteria do, but probably they have some complex chemical ways of magnetic reception. That is another research field by itself and this article’s volume is not enough to go into it.</p>
<p>Everything, every entity that we see around us calls us to reflect upon their Creator. The ones that we see with electron microscopes or high-tech tools are not exceptions. Magnetotactic bacteria synthesizes magnetite crystals from scratch and then puts them in an order like beads hitched on a string. Could it be possible for them to manage this incredible task on their own accord and without acting in the name of God? To this day we cannot even understand the basic principles of that process to its complete degree in order to mimic it. In fact, the more we understand the more we esteem and at awe we become from the great craft of Supreme Artist.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" size-full wp-image-6406" src="https://fountainmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/14_4-4ce.jpg" width="250" height="254" /></p>
<p>Auroras (northern lights), with their beautiful colors, make long winter nights more bearable in Arctic Circle. They are emitted by charged particles, something very harmful for living creatures if ever reached to earth’s surface and trapped in earth’s geomagnetic field. (Figure-4) While thinking about magnetotactic bacteria I remember those beautiful scenes I had seen in pictures that had caught my awe and wonder and can’t help but express deep gratitude once more to the Creator and Sustainer of it all, of us all, who guides the tiny little cells to more livable environments with the very same geomagnetic field that He protects us from harmful solar winds. Extraordinary is the ordinaries we are surrounded by!</p>
<p><em>Ahmet Uysal is a PhD candidate in Physics at Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.</em></p>
<h3><b>References</b></h3>
<ol>
<li>Richard P. Blakemore, 1982, “Magnetotactic bacteria”. Ann. Rev. Micrbiol. 36:217-238</li>
<li>Dirk Schüler, 2008, “Genetics and cell biology of magnetesome formation in magnetotactic bacteria”. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 32:654-672</li>
<li>Arash Komeili, 2007, “Molecular mechanisms of magnetesome formation”. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:351-366</li>
<li>Thorsten Ritz, Salih Adem, and Klaus Schulten, 2000, “A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds”. Biophysical Journal. 78:707-718</li>
<li>http://www.birdgeo.com/images/CTE1810.jpg</li>
<li>http://solar-center.stanford.edu/images/solar-wind-magfield_b.gif</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
